Skip to content
Fiscal Phil’s Band Aid Budget Before Brexit

Blog post -

Fiscal Phil’s Band Aid Budget Before Brexit

There hasn’t been a Budget on a Monday since 1962 when Chancellor Reggie Maudling, in the wake of the ‘night of the long knives’ (the time Prime Minister Harold Macmillan sacked half his Cabinet) started the policy of reflation. That one, like today, was a ‘mini-budget’ ahead of a more comprehensive plan the following spring.

Of course Philip Hammond didn’t want a mini Budget and certainly wouldn’t describe today as so. The problem is that having shifted the Budget to October, and stopping the spectacle of effectively two Budgets a year that was the preference his predecessor, the Chancellor is now hampered by uncertainty because of Brexit, on a scale not seen in comparable history. It is why he has upped Brexit preparation funding to more than £4bn.

Despite the positive language and the Chancellor’s trademark dry quips, it is clear from today’s speech that it is truly impossible for the Treasury to make serious strategic decisions. As he put it, government is ‘preparing for every eventuality’ a surely impossible task. And even if Hammond’s threatened ‘second Budget’ proves unnecessary, this means that next year’s spring statement will end up being much more like the substantial Budget– or a ‘full fiscal event’ as the Chancellor put it - that he would like to deliver and frankly the country needs. All Budget projections have been made on the basis of what they guess to be an ‘average-type free trade deal’. Chances are they won’t be assumptions that hold water.

In this sense, the Chancellor finds himself in a comparable position to the many business leaders who will have been listening to today’s announcements. With the outcome of Brexit negotiations still so very far from clear, the March 30th deadline fast approaching, and the increasing risk of ‘no deal’ the Chancellor is not in a position yet to properly provide a fiscal policy framework for the brave new world ahead - or even to articulate adequately the worked through priorities of his Treasury. Business too has found itself increasingly unable to take medium-term decisions and many have postponed investment in people and projects until the world becomes more certain. The Budget narrative reflects this: there are several welcome initiatives and some positive rhetoric… but nothing really matters until Brexit is clear.

There was also severely limited political capital stashed away in the Gladstone box today. This is not only because of the minority status of the government, shored up by a volatile DUP. As one of the Cabinet ‘sensibles’ and unpopular with his party’s right wing Hammond needed need to tread carefully between the realism of his Treasury’s bleak forecasts and striking a positive tone about post-Brexit Britain. It meant that Hammond could not do anything radical even if he had the inclination.

While the detail is text book fiscal policy, Budgets are political theatre – a chance to wrong foot enemies and to set political agendas. So if the fiscal ambitions of today’s Budget underwhelm, the politics could hardly be more critical. At play are all sides of the Brexit argument, an opposition determined to take advantage and public differences between Numbers 10 and 11 Downing Street.

Ahead of the speech this afternoon, the Prime Minister’s office was determined to strike a more positive tone than Hammond’s realism, assuring the public that all spending commitments would be met and that indeed ‘austerity’ is coming to an end. Theresa May’s premature announcement (Britain still runs a deficit – though not for current spending - and sits on £1.8tn debt)at the Conservative Party conference that austerity is effectively over meant that politically Hammond had little choice but to respond today but he has hardly lived up to expectations. Fortunately the Office of Budget Responsibility deficit estimates have been so wrong that the Chancellor has some £13bn he hadn’t previously banked on. In fact cumulatively the OBR has been overly pessimistic by as much as £60bn during the last three financial years. A little of that was splashed out this afternoon but we will have to wait until the spring to learn what this really means.

The ‘new path for public spending’ average annual real growth of 1.2% signalled is not as generous as some had wanted but there was the promise of much more for next year’s funding review in the event of a ‘good’ deal with the EU. For now it is a Band aid Budget, holding the line until the country is a more certain place.

However, there were some interesting projects and measures signalled in this Budget.

  • His rabbit out of the hat at the end was an increase in the personal allowance to £12,500 and a £50,000 start to higher rate. This was meant to wrong foot the opposition and generate happy headlines tomorrow - along with frozen beer, spirits and fuel duty.
  • Perhaps the most eye catching business initiative was support to the high street with £675m of for a ‘Future High Streets Fund’. Business Rates were also cut by a third for retailers with a rateable value of no more than £51,000 meaning an £8,000 saving on average for independent shops, cafes and pubs.
  • There was a tidy package to help support business with a promise to stimulate business investment and send the message that ‘Britain is open for business’. Hammond increased the Investment Allowance to £1m a year and confirmed the halving of financial commitment for smaller companies taking on apprentices.
  • One with small spend but which will provide good headlines were those about commemorating war, including £10m donated to the Armed Forces Covenant Trust to mark the centenary of the first world war.
  • £420 million to fill potholes and some other funds for abandoned waste sites is boring to say the least but few will be displeased.
  • Once again the Chancellor focused on tackling the productivity challenge from which Britain has suffered, to ‘manage change not hide from it’ – this included £1.6bn on technology and the digital economy and increasing funding on the infrastructure pipeline.
  • Hammond’s crackdown on tax avoidance by the big players will be welcome by the smaller. At the centre is the Digital Services Tax from April 2020 – a charge on UK generated revenues of big tech giants seen as not paying their dues amounting to ta2% on profits from UK users. Given the delay to implementation and the consultation period, this is a threat, and an invitation, to these companies to get their houses in order.
  • The hot political potato of housing was also assuaged with £500m extra to the Housing Infrastructure Fund.

For all the cheering, this Budget is little more than a set of (popular) projects and initiatives. It is not a long-term strategy and it never could have been. It signalled the ambitions of this Chancellor and showed where Brtain might be headed had Brexit not intervened. Hammond told the House that the UK has now turned a corner but the truth is that the future remains dramatically unclear. Some goodies were cleverly distributed by the Chancellor and that will be welcome, not least by business. However, this was a band aid Budget, holding fiscal policy together until the Chancellor can assess the post-Brexit landscape. It is what many businesses are doing also. 

Press contacts

Guy Bellamy

Guy Bellamy

Press contact Founder 07766 775216

Heavyweight thinking with a big footprint

elephant communications is a new name in corporate and consumer PR offering fresh thinking for a changed world: Insight-driven, strategically geared and creatively thought-through, we offer clients heavyweight thinking with a big footprint. Named 'New PR Agency of The Year' (PR Moment awards, London 2014)